Strategy 2023: Round 3 Trades
- Thread starter Tamuhawk
- Start date
Few Players i want. Zieball i will need to pass on due to FWD line structure. KInd of hoping Hall gets named this week. (Sorry)
Thinking Darcy to English - Chesser to Chandler via DPP
With the salem news i am thinking Chandler keeps that bench spot even when Kozzie returns. Has looked real good first 2 rounds.
OR
Darcy /Cameron - Callaghan /Setters - Chesser/Chandler
Darcy makes me nevious and after 2 games just looks off pace and then you have the Jackson. Just not working well together.
Really want English and Setters but can only get one.
Thinking Darcy to English - Chesser to Chandler via DPP
With the salem news i am thinking Chandler keeps that bench spot even when Kozzie returns. Has looked real good first 2 rounds.
OR
Darcy /Cameron - Callaghan /Setters - Chesser/Chandler
Darcy makes me nevious and after 2 games just looks off pace and then you have the Jackson. Just not working well together.
Really want English and Setters but can only get one.
Yes, sound analysis but you can swing Cameron FWD around the byes when Max is a juicy price. I would take 100 avg from Cameron for the rest of the Year.
English, just a better all round player this year, injury is a concern but those 150 games are on the horizon. Could Ryan (Tigers) act as cover moving forward from round 5.?
English, just a better all round player this year, injury is a concern but those 150 games are on the horizon. Could Ryan (Tigers) act as cover moving forward from round 5.?
- Joined
- 8 Mar 2012
- Messages
- 638
- Likes
- 1,587
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Hmmm.
I have J Macrae, A Brayshaw, S Docerty and B Grundy underperforming but I don't think I will trade any of them?
N Fyfe to J Ziebell (Hopefully Ziebell can be a keeper but I'm doubtfull. Didn't jump on hot players last year and it cost me.)
O Allen to K Chandler ($ grab for last trade)
L Jones DPP to W Setterfield (Reasoning same as Ziebell)
Leaves me light down back but it gets me 3 of the biggest price rise players.
Am I missing anything?
Anyone keen to give me their 5 cents?
I have J Macrae, A Brayshaw, S Docerty and B Grundy underperforming but I don't think I will trade any of them?
N Fyfe to J Ziebell (Hopefully Ziebell can be a keeper but I'm doubtfull. Didn't jump on hot players last year and it cost me.)
O Allen to K Chandler ($ grab for last trade)
L Jones DPP to W Setterfield (Reasoning same as Ziebell)
Leaves me light down back but it gets me 3 of the biggest price rise players.
Am I missing anything?
Anyone keen to give me their 5 cents?
- Joined
- 19 Jan 2016
- Messages
- 1,929
- Likes
- 6,564
No real issues, not ideal to have a bad score in round 2 but he had 4 games under 90 last year (3 70s), he'll cancel them out with a couple of big scores.
He had probably a dozen times in the game his teammates could have gone him and they generally do. Basically he looked fine and scored badly.
On my list of problems right now, he's just about at the bottom of the list. Congratulations if he's near the top of yours
The only missing factor in this is the on-field aspect. If comparing say Chandler and Setterfield, one is producing very good on-field scoring and has a role that's likely to continue to do so while Chandler has quite possibly put up his two best scores.
If cash gen is the only factor then the Chandler type is a better play, if on field scoring is a factor, and it likely is at round 3, then that factor is definitely worth considering.
Basically it comes down to whether getting say 30 points on field is worth more than the extra 50-100k that the rookie is likely to make. Really depends on how long you're going to be fielding them for this.
He had probably a dozen times in the game his teammates could have gone him and they generally do. Basically he looked fine and scored badly.
On my list of problems right now, he's just about at the bottom of the list. Congratulations if he's near the top of yours
The only missing factor in this is the on-field aspect. If comparing say Chandler and Setterfield, one is producing very good on-field scoring and has a role that's likely to continue to do so while Chandler has quite possibly put up his two best scores.
If cash gen is the only factor then the Chandler type is a better play, if on field scoring is a factor, and it likely is at round 3, then that factor is definitely worth considering.
Basically it comes down to whether getting say 30 points on field is worth more than the extra 50-100k that the rookie is likely to make. Really depends on how long you're going to be fielding them for this.
Yeah, get Chesser off field pronto!
/jk, I get that you're looping Wilmot
It will look a bit better once you get Setterfield off the bench but that raises teh question about sending Mackenzie to the bench while you still have 2 of of Constable, Wilmot, Cowan and Chesser on field down back.
It would make you more cookie cutter, but I'd seriously consider McKenna to sure up that defensive line a bit
/jk, I get that you're looping Wilmot
It will look a bit better once you get Setterfield off the bench but that raises teh question about sending Mackenzie to the bench while you still have 2 of of Constable, Wilmot, Cowan and Chesser on field down back.
It would make you more cookie cutter, but I'd seriously consider McKenna to sure up that defensive line a bit
LDU is an important pickup, that's true. Could be the last time we see him under 600k for a while if he is finally breaking out. But what about your rookies?
Your M8 and F6 will be doing you more damage at the moment than the difference between Laird and LDU. Not only that, but correcting those rookies will easily make you more money over the coming 6 weeks.
You have slow burners on the bench on every line in Cowan, Baker, maybe Davey, and Greene along with Cesser onfield. Wilmot looks to be going at a decent clip and we can assume that Constable keeps his gig and goes at 65 to 70 for a while yet so they're ok. Long looks ot have started great and if he can keep that 60 average up from 117k, will be one of the better rookies to have. Same with Caminiti who only needs 50-odd but provides you with bloody shaky coverage if required.
Is it really your top end that you should be looking at? (And should I be looking at bringing in Long instead of Ziebell and Setterfield)
Anyway... there's 2 ways to solve your lack of LDU. Either get him now while he's cheap or pay maybe 100k more for him in a month or two, by which stage, better rookies might have made you an extra 150k. Laird v LDU doesn't seem like a big difference. Might even be a step down in points for all we know. Chandler/Phillipou/Hollands or any of the performing midpricers vs some of your bench there does.
Your M8 and F6 will be doing you more damage at the moment than the difference between Laird and LDU. Not only that, but correcting those rookies will easily make you more money over the coming 6 weeks.
You have slow burners on the bench on every line in Cowan, Baker, maybe Davey, and Greene along with Cesser onfield. Wilmot looks to be going at a decent clip and we can assume that Constable keeps his gig and goes at 65 to 70 for a while yet so they're ok. Long looks ot have started great and if he can keep that 60 average up from 117k, will be one of the better rookies to have. Same with Caminiti who only needs 50-odd but provides you with bloody shaky coverage if required.
Is it really your top end that you should be looking at? (And should I be looking at bringing in Long instead of Ziebell and Setterfield)
Anyway... there's 2 ways to solve your lack of LDU. Either get him now while he's cheap or pay maybe 100k more for him in a month or two, by which stage, better rookies might have made you an extra 150k. Laird v LDU doesn't seem like a big difference. Might even be a step down in points for all we know. Chandler/Phillipou/Hollands or any of the performing midpricers vs some of your bench there does.
- Joined
- 8 Mar 2012
- Messages
- 638
- Likes
- 1,587
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Yeah, get Chesser off field pronto!
/jk, I get that you're looping Wilmot
It will look a bit better once you get Setterfield off the bench but that raises teh question about sending Mackenzie to the bench while you still have 2 of of Constable, Wilmot, Cowan and Chesser on field down back.
It would make you more cookie cutter, but I'd seriously consider McKenna to sure up that defensive line a bit
/jk, I get that you're looping Wilmot
It will look a bit better once you get Setterfield off the bench but that raises teh question about sending Mackenzie to the bench while you still have 2 of of Constable, Wilmot, Cowan and Chesser on field down back.
It would make you more cookie cutter, but I'd seriously consider McKenna to sure up that defensive line a bit
Second I was considering leaving the defence weak for 1 round with a view to bring Bowes in next round.
Now thinking I'm going to go all out and either make or break my season:
Dale, McVee and Chesser to Darcy Cameron, McKenna and Bowes via DPP. Puts Dunkley in the mids, leaves me with Bowes at D2... but also takes me from 1 underperforming premium and 2 stagnant rookies to a bloke that could easily be a top 6 forward, an excellent stepping stone and a "rookie" that'll make a fair bit of cash.
Dale, McVee and Chesser to Darcy Cameron, McKenna and Bowes via DPP. Puts Dunkley in the mids, leaves me with Bowes at D2... but also takes me from 1 underperforming premium and 2 stagnant rookies to a bloke that could easily be a top 6 forward, an excellent stepping stone and a "rookie" that'll make a fair bit of cash.
- Joined
- 19 Jan 2016
- Messages
- 722
- Likes
- 2,250
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
I'm very conflicted on darcy. I watched the first half of freo v north. Darcy was terrible and everything he touched went wrong. I actually don't think he got a fair chance at most of the centre bounces. The ball literally never bounced properly, so he never got in position to get a hitout. Hopefully they fix the centre square!?
