Search results

2010 this week. Rookies sucked apart from Taylor and Bewley and Sicily's 44 hurt alot. Somehow only dropped 67 spots to 767th.

Agree with this. Pitto is still scoring great for bloke I paid $310k for and he is still going up, Viney is a concern but wait a week or 2. Rookie mids look like they are maxxed out and quite likely to get dropped (Brown/Budarick/Rivers) so covering donuts is going to be my focus on thursday...

Easy Townsend is playing, so keep him. Noble closer to maxed out so he goes before Brander IMO

Keeffe has been named, and he is only there to cover Davis, that said Taylor is out too but I would suggest that means Corr returns to a lockdown role rather than roaming around free as he has done the last two weeks.

He has been around a long time and never scored like that before, I would be discounting it as an aberration as he normally plays a lock down role.

He replaced Mason Wood, who has surely had his last chance. That said, the Kangaroos have a quite a few tall options up forward and as a fringe 22 player, if he has a down week he may well lose his spot. I have had him at R3 since day 1, so I hope he stays in for a while, but not at all confident.

My dilemma come down to trading out Howe/BZT/CTaylor; Ins 1 - Lloyd Green (gets Rivers or Bennell off field & BZT goes) or 2 - Ridley Whitfield (Gets CTaylor off field and gone) Currently top 1000 so points rule, and so i'm leaning toward 2, even if it is a week early of Whitfield (I think...

I have the same premo Defenders, and like Lloyd for the same reason, however by bringing in Ridley I can move Taylor or Bewley to Whitfield (F5) next week. Given Bewley has been scoring acceptably I think getting Taylor off the field is critical. This balancing of points v earning potential is...

2279 and jumped 2200 spots into 700th. Just needing to cover Howe’s loss, And team value is down compared to similarly ranked players. Cash gen needs to be a focus this week.

Well Mumford & Guns climbed 2200 spots and into 700th. Cash generation is a little light however, so thinking Howe to Ridley ($110k less than Haynes), and finally dump BZT to Green via Rivers. Green can cover M8, and Rivers goes to the bench, it keeps scoring solid and Green boosts cash gen.

The issue with Naismith as I see it, is that he is no longer a solo ruck. Sinclair and McLean both rucked for the Swans last week, and neither got dropped, so I’m not sure Naismith tons up this week, maybe 80’s is a more realistic expectation. If you have him great, but I think he is a...

Sticking fat with Brayshaw, he had minimal game time in a Freo side that only turned up at 3/4tr time, so I expect better next week. He also played in the middle which is what I wanted to see, so I reckon he’s a hold (for now). DRobertson to Sturt/Georgiades via Budarick is probably my only trade.

Considering those two myself if Young is named, but I cant see Young being much of a scorer. Low possession count means 30-50 type player I think.

To me Parkers ability to make cash from here is very limited as the Saints are winning and he still ain't scoring. I would much prefer a cheaper rookie fwd, but at least Baker looks like he should stay in a winning Tigers side and score ok and make at least $100k quickly.

1. Parker>Baker and then can do one of; a) Moore to Boak b) Butters to Dusty A or B peoples?

Currently going with Gawn into Rockliff (at home v North)

Why is everyone so keen to move Butters on? Yes, he should have a week off, but if he keeps averaging 62 he's another 80k to make pre bye. Are we that desperate for cash?

I stand corrected, thanks!

Walsh only makes $150k if he averages 75. Rocky also makes that if he averages 90. I am punting that Rocky will average well over the ton and become a keeper, if he averages 90 well its not a win but he still elevated my overall score, and it was worth a try.

Seriously considering Walsh up to Rocky as I have the cash, and will stick the VC (into McRae) on him just for good measure.