Position Forward Discussion

Which players caught your eye after Marsh 1...?

  • H Greenwood

    Votes: 25 30.9%
  • D Parish

    Votes: 14 17.3%
  • A Brayshaw

    Votes: 14 17.3%
  • C Petracca

    Votes: 54 66.7%
  • C Rozee

    Votes: 16 19.8%
  • J Martin

    Votes: 6 7.4%
  • C Wingard

    Votes: 8 9.9%
  • B Acres

    Votes: 13 16.0%
  • D Smith

    Votes: 26 32.1%
  • None of the above

    Votes: 2 2.5%

  • Total voters
    81
Joined
24 Feb 2015
Messages
6,697
Likes
30,160
AFL Club
Sydney
Jack Steven I just can't buy into the hype yet, I can see him just being a headache all season. Smith I wasn't overly impressed with last night but his score was much better than I though his game was so that's one thing.

I still struggle with seeing Lynch being top 6 forward. I agree with @Dimmawit in that if you nail a couple of the right forwards to ride early it'll go a long way to having a succesful season. Whitfield, Martin givens for me, Heeney role/fitness, Walters role/fitness and then the next line of possibles Greenwood, Petracca, Smith????, DeGoey????, Dawson, Parish, McDonald, Kennedy, Gresham, Lynch. It's a tough one and why I don't like starting them but bringing them in early.

For me Greenwood has the role and has shown he can score well but does he have the team and tank? Petracca I don't need to anymore from what's been said. Smith I'm not sure will see as much mid time as I originally thought so his numbers might be up and down, DeGoey could improve if given more midfield time but I suspect he'll be needed forward when he's not at the Vet, Dawson I like but need to see some rpe-season games but might be better value in defence towards the end of the season, Parish needs to clean his disposal up but found plenty of it last night and contested numbers good, McDonald and Kennedy both have history in the mid to high 90's - might be enough this season - I don't know, too hard for me to work out.
 

THCLT

BBL|05 Winner
Joined
13 Sep 2014
Messages
18,593
Likes
118,245
AFL Club
North Melb.
Smith I wasn't overly impressed with last night but his score was much better than I though his game was so that's one thing.
The thing I noted, which many on here seems to have overlooked, was that his midfield stint during the 2nd half coincided with Zerrett/Parish being rested. One notable was that McGrath was in there a lot, and they still have Heppell to fit in. He's still out for my team and I would need much more evidence next game to sway my opinion.
 
Joined
24 Feb 2015
Messages
6,697
Likes
30,160
AFL Club
Sydney
The thing I noted, which many on here seems to have overlooked, was that his midfield stint during the 2nd half coincided with Zerrett/Parish being rested. One notable was that McGrath was in there a lot, and they still have Heppell to fit in. He's still out for my team and I would need much more evidence next game to sway my opinion.
I thought I read somewhere or maybe it was one of my drucken Bomber mates say they thought Heppell might play HBF?
 

Rowsus

Statistician
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
29,132
Likes
64,897
AFL Club
Melbourne
I to was on trac bandwagon before last Saturday my reasoning was that he was coming into his 5th? year and contract year and I thought what a combo :D and the 5th year is when the tall mids usually go bang

but I was put off by rowsus's thoughts on him when I asked him about a month a go but still stuck with him

but last saturday (even for a practise match)reaffirmed my suspicions
I will temper my previous answer to you, with this snippet. When I answered your question, I hadn't laid eyes on Tracc this season. Watching last weekend, the first thing that struck me was how much trimmer he is! One of the big Xs against him in the past was, he was too thick in the trunk and thighs, and had no tank. The tank still remains a query, but physically, he's a different specimen this season!
 
Joined
13 Mar 2012
Messages
2,790
Likes
2,985
AFL Club
Adelaide
Either they under score or get injured. Basically anything that requires you to move them on. Where do you go. Down grade to rookie? Sideways trade to someone else maybe on the up? If you have one mid price failure you can either carry them or if someone is shown to be on the rise and within reach cash wise you can trade. But multiple mid pricers (eg 4 fwds) often means you need to deal with most likely two fails. And mid pricers at the lower end of the scale eg Smith and Stevens are the hardest to fix.
If they are not injured and there is no good trade option why would you trade them? If they are underperforming well who knows in 1 week it could turn around alternatively there at an easy price point to upgrade relative to other rookies.

I have never found there to be no good options if they are injured. There’s always an option. I have found them the easiest players to fix TBH

I don’t see it much different to an underperforming “premium” is it? You hold until an opportunity presents and they may come good before you have to make a D.

Steven and Smith playing midfield or partly makes it hard for them to go that badly that you feel you simply must trade them early.

I think both are good picks
 
Last edited:

THCLT

BBL|05 Winner
Joined
13 Sep 2014
Messages
18,593
Likes
118,245
AFL Club
North Melb.
I thought I read somewhere or maybe it was one of my drucken Bomber mates say they thought Heppell might play HBF?
Maybe...but I would like to see Smith in amongst the action with their 1st mid rotation before I will change my stance on him. Like you mention, he'll definitely have games where his midfield minutes will be dominant, but whether this is enough to get him over the line is another matter.
 
Joined
13 Jan 2015
Messages
833
Likes
647
AFL Club
Brisbane
I will temper my previous answer to you, with this snippet. When I answered your question, I hadn't laid eyes on Tracc this season. Watching last weekend, the first thing that struck me was how much trimmer he is! One of the big Xs against him in the past was, he was too thick in the trunk and thighs, and had no tank. The tank still remains a query, but physically, he's a different specimen this season!
thats fair enough I was only pointing out what you said wasn't that "good" let hope he will be a good pick
 

Connoisseur

Leadership Group
Joined
3 Jul 2017
Messages
38,960
Likes
126,628
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
@Connoisseur if I include Petracca, it will be at the expense of Parish. Could you please do a summary of Parish like Petracca above so that I can compare. (Apologies if you have already done it - I had better go back and check!)
Sorry for the delay as it was fairly difficult to get the documents released.

D Parish:
1582791716577.png

1582791744577.png

1582791762627.png

Wins: 85.94 from 32 (11/32 below 80, 25/32 below 100, 1/32 120+)
2016: 94 from 2
2017: 78.64 from 11
2018: 90 from 7
2019: 88.92 from 12

Losses: 72.86 from 42 (27/42 below 80, 40/42 below 100, 1/42 120+)
2016: 69.72 from 18
2017: 72.88 from 8
2018: 71.88 from 8
2019: 80.88 from 8

Career disposals avg: 20.74 from 74
SC avg when disposals equal/exceed 21: 87.60 from 43 (13/43 below 80, 34/43 below 100, 2/43 120+)
SC avg when disposals below 21: 65.90 from 31 (25/31 below 80, 31/31 below 100, 0/43 120+)

Career TOG% avg: 76.24% from 74
SC avg when TOG% equal/exceed 77: 83.15 from 41 (18/41 below 80, 33/41 below 100, 2/41 120+)
SC avg when TOG% below 77: 72.76 from 33 (20/33 below 80, 32/33 below 100, 0/33 120+)
 

THCLT

BBL|05 Winner
Joined
13 Sep 2014
Messages
18,593
Likes
118,245
AFL Club
North Melb.
A thought just crossed my mind which I felt was worthy to share...

Would we even be contemplating/entertaining the likes of Petracca/Greenwood/Parish or similar if we had more 'proven, reliable & bankable' options, say a Dangerfield/Dunkley/TKelly/Zorko from past seasons...?

It's an interesting reflection for me and I'm thinking striking that balance is the way forward for my team.
 
Joined
13 Jan 2015
Messages
833
Likes
647
AFL Club
Brisbane
trac was always going to be in my team

with danger's hard start he would have been first upgrade

Kelly would have been a lock for me

Zorko probably would have been in
 
Joined
21 Jan 2016
Messages
8,418
Likes
31,967
AFL Club
Collingwood
I'm just catching up on reading this thread, but noticed some interest in Petracca's early years.

2014 Draft Profile: Christian Petracca
June 24, 2014 by Peter Williams

Christian Petracca (Eastern Ranges)
Height: 186 cm
Weight: 92 kg
Position: Midfielder/forward
Player Comparison: Chad Wingard/Josh Kennedy (Sydney)
Strengths: Contested marking, goal kicking, contested ball winning
Areas of Improvement: Disposal efficiency
Suitable Teams: Melbourne, Brisbane, North Melbourne, Richmond
In my mind, anywhere past pick seven or eight and Christian Petracca Petracca becomes a steal.
Talent wise, Petracca is worthy of a top five pick, and on output, he’s number one. He’s a strong bodied forward-cum-midfielder, but to pigeon hole him as one or the other is to misjudge him.
After kicking over 40 goals as an underager – keep in mind Tom Boyd, Michael Apeness and Dan McStay all played in that forward line at times – Petracca hired a running coach and dropped six kilograms over the summer. His dedication and professionalism is at the upper echelon.
Now he is the vice-captain of the Ranges and a full-time midfielder. He can do it all. His body is strong enough to dominate on the inside and his skills are good enough to damage on the outside. Don’t worry about his disposal efficiency, as many of his kicks come from contested situations.
He reminds me of Chad Wingard as every disposal he has changes the game. He often records five or more inside 50s per game and they are usually lace out. He is the best contested mark for his height and he could easily beat most key defenders in the air.
He is an absolute game changer and has the most x-factor in this draft class. He can rack up the ball consistently too, so he is an unquestionable prospect this year. You only have to look at his work for Vic Metro, where he has been in the top two ball winners in every game he has played.
His two Metro games so far have yielded him impressive stats:
– vs. Western Australia: 27 disposals at 85%, two goals, one behind, seven marks, four tackles, seven clearances, nine contested possessions and four inside 50s.
– vs. Vic Country: 31 disposals at 65%, seven marks, three tackles, four clearances, 11 contested possessions and six inside 50s.
In 2012, Petracca averaged 19.4 disposals as a half forward, with 2.4 goals per game and only two goalless games. In six of his 17 games, he had three goals of more, including hauls of six and five. His Preliminary Final performance against the Falcons had him score over 200 Champion Data points, as his five goals, five behinds, 11 marks – an incredible nine of those contested – and 23 possessions showed that he is indeed the most impressive player in this year’s crop.
In 2012, he displayed his ball-winning skills even more, with an average of 23.8 disposals in five games as well as 1.6 goals per game. He’s also averaged 4.2 tackles, and although he’s only averaged 4.6 marks per game this year, he highest total was 11 marks, and two of those marks per game have been contested.
The only ‘downside’ is that he is not a key forward, but any side which drafts him gets a strong forward and elite midfielder with the one pick. There is no player who can produce the numbers that he can. He is a once in a generation type of guy.
 
Joined
21 Jan 2016
Messages
8,418
Likes
31,967
AFL Club
Collingwood
The thing I noted, which many on here seems to have overlooked, was that his midfield stint during the 2nd half coincided with Zerrett/Parish being rested. One notable was that McGrath was in there a lot, and they still have Heppell to fit in. He's still out for my team and I would need much more evidence next game to sway my opinion.
Good observation! I'm sooo undecided with D Smith, because I don't know how much time he will spend midfield. Like you, I'm waiting for the 2nd Marsh game before I decide.
Regarding McGrath, yeah, that looks to be his role this year, in the midfield.
 

Connoisseur

Leadership Group
Joined
3 Jul 2017
Messages
38,960
Likes
126,628
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Thank you @Connoisseur you are a gentleman and a scholar!

At first glance, the figures still make him look more appealing than Petracca so I am unlikely to take Trac instead of him. However, Trac is scaring me now so I might now have to find a way to have both!
Always happy to help.

Any particular/key reason you prefer Parish over Petracca?
 

Bomber18

Leadership Group
Joined
11 Nov 2012
Messages
27,409
Likes
65,138
AFL Club
Essendon
D.Smith averaging 90 at 335k is almost good enough as a pure cash cow, would get to 440k~450k. Averaged ~90 playing 65%+ of his time as a forward at GWS in a side that was bottom four as well!

In any case, as a supporter, I'm pretty confident that when push comes to shove, it'll be D.Smith in the CBAs and stoppages over Parish/McGrath types. Neither offer the level of pressure around stoppages that Devon does - Devon also topped the Pressure Acts with 30 in Marsh 1.
 
Joined
21 Jan 2016
Messages
8,418
Likes
31,967
AFL Club
Collingwood
D.Smith averaging 90 at 335k is almost good enough as a pure cash cow, would get to 440k~450k. Averaged ~90 playing 65%+ of his time as a forward at GWS in a side that was bottom four as well!

In any case, as a supporter, I'm pretty confident that when push comes to shove, it'll be D.Smith in the CBAs and stoppages over Parish/McGrath types. Neither offer the level of pressure around stoppages that Devon does - Devon also topped the Pressure Acts with 30 in Marsh 1.
That's why D Smith is currently in my side as well. Also, because he's a Rd12 Bye player, which I haven't got many of.
 
Joined
12 May 2013
Messages
722
Likes
878
AFL Club
Essendon
D.Smith averaging 90 at 335k is almost good enough as a pure cash cow, would get to 440k~450k. Averaged ~90 playing 65%+ of his time as a forward at GWS in a side that was bottom four as well!

In any case, as a supporter, I'm pretty confident that when push comes to shove, it'll be D.Smith in the CBAs and stoppages over Parish/McGrath types. Neither offer the level of pressure around stoppages that Devon does - Devon also topped the Pressure Acts with 30 in Marsh 1.
Agree, he is our best defensive mid and unless our new gameplan is to go total run and gun, he will have a signifcant mid role. Even if this wasn't the case, he has shown he can scored ~90 ish from a mid/hff-fwd role at GWS.

The fact that he is playing Marsh games is the only assurance I needed.
 
Top